How should one interpret medical opinions if they contradict each other?

Interpreting medical opinions that contradict one another requires a comprehensive approach, which is why evaluating them in the context of the entire record is crucial. Each medical opinion should be considered alongside the complete medical history, treatment records, diagnostic tests, and functional evidence. This broader context helps to understand the rationale behind each opinion, the consistency of findings over time, and how those opinions relate to the individual's overall health condition.

Medical evaluations can vary for numerous reasons, such as different specialties of the providers involved, varying interpretations of test results, or differing experiences with the patient. By assessing these opinions within the full context of the medical record, one can discern which opinions align with established medical facts and which may be based on limited information or biases.

This comprehensive evaluation not only aids in making more informed decisions regarding the individual's disability claim but also ensures that all relevant evidence is considered, which is crucial in the adjudication process of Social Security Disability Insurance cases.