In what case would a representative typically need to avoid conflicts of interest?

A representative typically needs to avoid conflicts of interest when representing multiple clients in similar cases. This is crucial because the interests of different clients may not align, and a representative must remain impartial and act in the best interest of each client. Potential conflicts can arise if one client's case could negatively affect another client's outcome, leading to ethical dilemmas and undermining the integrity of the representation.

In legal and advocacy contexts, it is vital for representatives to disclose any conflicts of interest and, if necessary, seek consent from clients before proceeding. Maintaining professional and ethical standards ensures that clients receive fair representation and that the representative does not exploit any advantages offered by competing interests.

Other contexts, such as attorneys representing a single client, options for contingency compensation, or being part of a nonprofit organization, may also present potential conflicts, but the complexity and direct conflict that can arise from multiple clients facing similar issues necessitate a heightened level of diligence to avoid ethical breaches.