What is the main focus when evaluating opinion evidence for claims filed before March 27, 2017?

The main focus when evaluating opinion evidence for claims filed before March 27, 2017, is indeed centered on the consistency with medical evidence and treatment records. This period was characterized by rigorous standards for determining the credibility of medical opinions in relation to the overall evidence presented in a claim.

In this context, the Social Security Administration emphasized the need to ensure that medical opinions align with the objective findings and documented treatment histories available. A medical opinion that is consistent with that evidence is often given more weight, as it supports the validity of the claim and helps to establish the severity of a claimant's condition. This integration of opinion evidence with the existing medical records provides a clearer picture of the claimant's functional capacity and any limitations they may face as a result of their impairments.

The focus on consistency also helps adjudicators assess whether the opinion is based on a thorough understanding of the claimant's medical history and current status. It reflects a holistic approach to evaluating the case, ensuring that opinions are not considered in isolation but rather in conjunction with the full spectrum of available medical documentation.